I who is considered existentialist

Going back to my authentic being with faith and reason in previous experiences, I may include me as an existentialist or pragmatist for which myself had a devious way to harmonize two entities, because my so-called faith is faith from my parent’s faith as traditional belief. For long time, I thought human mental life can effectively comprise a constant interplay between volitions and beliefs. The reason why I devote my efforts to do it is that I wouldn’t want to be duped by blind faith. I gave myself a wide space that there is doubt in faith, which can be tested through human acting intellectual faculties effectively. Consequently, the wide gap between two has becoming serious situation, somehow I led to trap by my limited capacity from both sides, and suddenly I had no doubt to believe the authentic truth must be existed, only the one who is independent being. Slowly and slowly, I was convinced to be a true believer by myself. Pope Benedict 16th said “faith and reason are two wings on which human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth…” I am experiencing this potential mutual approach although there is no absolute verificational sense to ensure God’s existence and value, but faith would at least provide moral motivations and self-understanding as pope articulate in the beginning. The encyclical letter re-inject the synergy both faith and reason, truth can be revealed by human intellectual activities.

2012 is time for ARK, life is journey in which there are full of myths and misery, whom can know how and when is the time happened for, we cannot split from the corporal substance meaning human beings must be back the stage we oringated. it has shown that the signified time for all who must be changeable in someways, acting the virtue, ransom the value, and kindness all. in a new culture, no boundary, no nationalism, no indefrential religious.....

Arguring professor

I was so wondering the satement that the actual concept of things is more perfect than the concept of God, I want to extend the concept of God as a no-universal subjectivity to require, the notion of God will be more in transcendial level of God, otherwise the Anselm is still processing the God for understand without trnscendential being.